in reply to Re^5: Moving from SQL to flat-files
in thread Moving from SQL to flat-files

Actually, I don't mind bigger that much. I just wanted to confirm if I was doing something wrong, and if there was any other way of getting a count of all the records.

Once I know all the "gotchas" I can make a decision.

Many thanks,

--

when small people start casting long shadows, it is time to go to bed

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Moving from SQL to flat-files
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on May 11, 2006 at 18:42 UTC
    I don't think I was as clear as I needed to be. Try the following code with a hash tied against the various DBMs.
    use Data::Dumper; # %x is the tied hash. $x{foo} = [ 1 .. 3, { a => { b => 'c' } } ]; print Dumper \%x;
    Using DBM::Deep, the following will be printed:
    $VAR1 = { 'foo' => bless( [ '1', '2', '3', bless( { 'a' => bless( { 'b' => 'c' }, 'DBM::Deep::Hash +' ) }, 'DBM::Deep::Hash' ) ], 'DBM::Deep::Array' ) };
    Ignoring the random blessings, the entire data structure as Perl would see it is encoded. Using BerkeleyDB, you see
    $VAR1 = { 'foo' => 'ARRAY(0x18014f4)' };

    Note: this is as designed for BDB - it isn't meant to handle anything as the value other than a simple binary string. DBM::Deep is.


    My criteria for good software:
    1. Does it work?
    2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?