in reply to SOAP and Perl

I've also found it frustrating getting SOAP::Lite to work with services not made with SOAP::Lite. If you're really interested in getting it to work from Perl, you should read the 'INTEROPERABILITY' section in SOAP::Lite's documentation. My problem with getting it to work with .Net (I know you're using Java, not .Net) was more in terms of getting the developer writing the service to give a clear example of how the service is actually called with XML, rather than code examples in VB. Given some actual XML sent to the server, it's pretty easy to get SOAP::Lite to work right.

Just for your information, your articles do seem a bit trollish. If that's your intention, then carry on, but otherwise you might want to sign up for an account. Some people ignore Anonymous Monk (I often do).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: SOAP and Perl
by sgt (Deacon) on May 30, 2006 at 21:52 UTC

    I have an account, but I often forget to log in... today I have answered a couple questions as anon...damm

Re^2: SOAP and Perl
by Anonymous Monk on May 29, 2006 at 16:53 UTC

    Actually the code generated by the stub maker tells pretty much everythign you want to know as how to call the service. Well the bottom line is that the generated code has to work ;-).

    As whether it was trollish, it is not to my standard, but I don't feel the need to be nice either. If I really want to be trollish, I don't need to be anon, I can create an account, and use it fully for trolling. What's the difference. The word troll has been over used. Anything harsh is called trolllish.

      I guess fully should read solely ;-)