in reply to Works on one machine, fails on another
Update:After checking the precedence, it's not really necessary to use 'and' instead of '&&' here, but to me it makes the intention more clear.
Ups! duh. missed the '== 0'. More coffee for me please.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Works on one machine, fails on another
by arturo (Vicar) on Feb 01, 2001 at 23:02 UTC |