Re^3: A Better Word Morph Builder

Ieronim,
I have finished benchmarking the routines. I didn't include any from this thread or this one but you are welcome to. I did not penalize any routine for processing the dictionary. Additionally, if there were a number of small variations for a routine, I only included the fastest.

            Rate limbic__2 solo____1 limbic__3 limbic__4 ieronim_1 lim
+bic__1
limbic__2 6.48/s        --      -45%      -62%      -90%      -95%    
+  -96%
solo____1 11.8/s       82%        --      -31%      -82%      -92%    
+  -92%
limbic__3 17.3/s      166%       46%        --      -74%      -88%    
+  -89%
limbic__4 67.5/s      941%      471%      291%        --      -53%    
+  -55%
ieronim_1  143/s     2104%     1109%      728%      112%        --    
+   -5%
limbic__1  150/s     2218%     1171%      771%      123%        5%    
+    --
[download]

limbic__1..4 from nodes 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively
ieronim_1 from this node (updated)
solo____1 from this node

Please note that the winner is just my re-write of Ieronim's code with a few extra bells and whistles. Since the benchmark is extremely long, I have put it in spoiler tags as well as readmore tags:

Update (2006-07-03): These benchmarks do not reflect the realization I made concerning when to test if a path connection has been made that I noted elsewhere in this thread.

Cheers - L~R

Comment on Re^3: A Better Word Morph Builder Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: A Better Word Morph Builder by Ieronim (Friar) on Jun 30, 2006 at 19:10 UTC
The results of the same benchmark (!!) on my machine are here: `Rate limbic__2 solo____1 limbic__3 limbic__4 limbic__1 ier +onim_1 limbic__2 5.64/s -- -63% -77% -94% -97% + -97% solo____1 15.3/s 172% -- -37% -83% -92% + -92% limbic__3 24.2/s 329% 58% -- -74% -87% + -88% limbic__4 91.7/s 1528% 499% 279% -- -52% + -54% limbic__1 190/s 3267% 1140% 684% 107% -- + -5% ieronim_1 200/s 3449% 1207% 727% 118% 5% + --` [download] I can't explain the difference :))	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: A Better Word Morph Builder by Solo (Deacon) on Jun 30, 2006 at 22:06 UTC
I can't explain the difference :)) Are the inputs for the benchmarks the same words in both cases? --Solo -- You said you wanted to be around when I made a mistake; well, this could be it, sweetheart.	[reply] [d/l]