in reply to Use of undescore to reuse file stat data is slower
Your benchmark code is wrong. You call each of your coderefs instead of passing them. You meant instead something like this:
cmpthese( 500_000, { statreuse => $coderef, nostatreuse => $coderef1, });
With working benchmark code I see the _ version running 78% faster than the separate calls.
Update: Meh, typo'd the percentage faster. Actual results running 500,000 tests with test.lnk being a plain file:
Rate nostatreuse statreuse
nostatreuse 65189/s -- -44%
statreuse 116279/s 78% --
Results from stock OS X perl v5.8.6 on a dual 2.7 G5.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Use of undescore to reuse file stat data is slower
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 11, 2006 at 03:34 UTC |