in reply to MJD's "Design Patterns Aren't"
One point that Dominus parenthetically made is that C++ is essentially a 1970's era language, which begs the question why one would use archaic technology.
Why should it raise that question? Something has to talk to hardware.
Now for a system programming language, I generally agree with you. Vanilla (even standardized) C++ is fairly insufficient for high-level tasks. Throw Boost in there and it's somewhat better.
|
|---|