in reply to Re^2: ternary operator
in thread ternary operator

which to me looks like:

$OPER = 's' = 'c';

[download]

when $test ne 'c' is true. And that should fail with a "Can't modify constant item in scalar assignment" error. However no errors and no warnings are generated for either condition.

Using ?: to select a variable to be assigned to I'm happy with:

test ? $p1 : $p2 = value;

[download]

but the half assignement variant implied by the precedence (and made explicit by the brackets shown in your reply) is just bizare.

DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: ternary operator
by Sidhekin (Priest) on Jul 17, 2006 at 23:45 UTC

    which to me looks like: $OPER = 's' = 'c'; when $test ne 'c' is true. And that should fail with a "Can't modify constant item in scalar assignment" error.

    You're forgetting the precedence -- or should I say associativity? -- no, I think precedence is correct here. It is actually like ($OPER = 's') = 'c', which, while admittedly bizarre, is perfectly legal, since $OPER = 's' evaluates to an lvalue $OPER. Observe the difference: 

    sidhekin@blackbox:~$ perl -le '($c = 1) = 2; print $c'
2
sidhekin@blackbox:~$ perl -le '$c = 1 = 2; print $c'
Can't modify constant item in scalar assignment at -e line 1, near "2;
+"
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
sidhekin@blackbox:~$

    [download]

    print "Just another Perl ${\(trickster and hacker)},"
    The Sidhekin proves Sidhe did it!

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom