in reply to Re^2: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )
in thread Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

I see trinary somewhat as a shibboleth among Perl cognoscenti in much the same way that Perl itself is, or indeed as stumbit is among Perl Monks. It is these small things that distinguish us from users of other run of the mill boring languages and that enrich our use and immersion in our chosen language, that provides part of the solution and will prevent Perl from dying out.

DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel
  • Comment on Re^3: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

In Section Meditations