in reply to Re^2: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )
in thread Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

This is not just a perl issue, though. ?: is most often called the ternary operator in several programming languages. I don't even see the Camel as cited as disagreeing; it just says that the operator whose name is "the ternary operator" is a member (and the only one, in perl) of the class of trinary operators.
  • Comment on Re^3: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

In Section Meditations