in reply to Re^3: Using the strict module in object oriented programming
in thread Using the strict module in object oriented programming

Without the flexibility, we'd have one solution

This is not about black or white. MOP doesn't eliminate flexibility, it just defines an interface around it.

-xdg

Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.

  • Comment on Re^4: Using the strict module in object oriented programming

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Using the strict module in object oriented programming
by phaylon (Curate) on Jul 26, 2006 at 11:47 UTC
    Yes, but MOP based on a more abstract implementation is in my eyes more flexible than just having one MOP implementation. What I meant was that I'm comfortable with not being tied to that MOP system. It's much more enjoyable to use if that decision is up to you.
    Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- Aleister Crowley
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom