Re^5: Class::InsideOut 1.01 now with added sugar

That should work, although I haven’t tested it. And yeah, it’s probably better off in a separate wrapper module. At which point I’d probably switch to a Class:Stdish attribute interface, making it my %name : public; instead.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re^5: Class::InsideOut 1.01 now with added sugar Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Class::InsideOut 1.01 now with added sugar by xdg (Monsignor) on Jul 28, 2006 at 12:32 UTC
Attributes create more complexity again (e.g. extra steps for mod_perl compatibility) -- exactly the kind of thing I'm trying to avoid. If you want that kind of interface, I'd go with Class::Std or Object::InsideOut. As a side note for anyone following this thread, one advantage of the separate property label is that you can have your lexical hashes follow PBP style guides without affecting the accessor name: `public name => my %name_of;` [download] -xdg Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: Class::InsideOut 1.01 now with added sugar
by xdg (Monsignor) on Jul 28, 2006 at 12:32 UTC

Attributes create more complexity again (e.g. extra steps for mod_perl compatibility) -- exactly the kind of thing I'm trying to avoid. If you want that kind of interface, I'd go with Class::Std or Object::InsideOut.

As a side note for anyone following this thread, one advantage of the separate property label is that you can have your lexical hashes follow PBP style guides without affecting the accessor name:

public name => my %name_of;
[download]

-xdg

Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.

[reply]
[d/l]