in reply to Re: !0 is not necessarily 1 (was Re: Secret Perl Operators: the boolean list squash operator, x!!) (Larry)
in thread Secret Perl Operators: the boolean list squash operator, x!!

The camel is a derived text, not an authoritative text, because it's never viewed as "a required doc" for Perl development.

When the patch is made to perldoc, I'll shut up about my claim. The evidence in the camel is a hint that the perldoc should indeed be patched.

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

  • Comment on Re^2: !0 is not necessarily 1 (was Re: Secret Perl Operators: the boolean list squash operator, x!!) (Larry)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations