Re^2: Testing if A is in a record, The B must be in the Record

in reply to Re: Testing if A is in a record, The B must be in the Record
in thread Testing if A is in a record, The B must be in the Record

I have been looking at re-writing this script to use Parse::RecDescent for over a year, but since the script is "good enough" how it is, other fires get put out first. You know how it is.

Thanks for the comments

Comment on Re^2: Testing if A is in a record, The B must be in the Record

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Testing if A is in a record, The B must be in the Record by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 03, 2006 at 17:59 UTC
Even with P::RD, you'd be better off doing the test at the end as you are doing now. It greatly simplifies the grammar. In technical terms, it's best to seperate syntax from semantics. It sounds like you have a good solution.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom