in reply to Re^3: Dominus on the non-greedy version of the ? quantifier
in thread Dominus on the non-greedy version of the ? quantifier

the non-greedy being significantly better at matching the short version

You consider 2% "significant"? 20% is rarely significant when it comes to Benchmark results, IME.

Oh -- and it _does_ change the values of $1, $2, $3

It does? I don't see how. Testing with "-f" and "-field" don't show any difference for me.

- tye        

  • Comment on Re^4: Dominus on the non-greedy version of the ? quantifier (diff)

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom