Re^2: RFC Fuse::Remote modules

"Linux" in the title would be nice too. "FUSE" is an acronym isn't it? Shouldn't it be capitalized?

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

Comment on Re^2: RFC Fuse::Remote modules

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC Fuse::Remote modules by marto (Cardinal) on Aug 18, 2006 at 23:25 UTC
'"Linux" in the title would be nice too.' Actually I read the Supported Operating Systems section of the wiki which lists FreeBSD also, so I did not feel adding Linux to the title was ideal. I have updated the post changing Fuse to FUSE where appropriate. Thanks for your input. Martin	[reply]
Re^4: RFC Fuse::Remote modules by dpavlin (Friar) on Aug 23, 2006 at 15:04 UTC
There is another (unrelated) project on CPAN named FUSE. Perl bindings for fuse have name Fuse, so I would suggest to call your module Fuse::FTP after all. FreeBSD support for Fuse is somewhat experimental (most of tests are broken on FreeBSD), but filesystems do work (I hope, if not, please bug me :-). There is plan to rewrite test suite which would also fix FreeBSD problems. 2share!2flame...	[reply]