in reply to Re: How do you define "elegant"?
in thread How do you define "elegant"?
I otherwise agree with your overall thrust.
As for the ternary, python has long tried to resist the loud calls for its inclusion, on the same sort of grounds as your C programming team. I think last I heard it was adopted for 2.5, but I could be wrong. Sometimes even Guido must bend to pragmatism.
--
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]
|
|---|