Re^3: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?

What do you expect to gain from the XML-RPC?!? Apart from the need of beefier hardware. Do you need to be able to run those three layers on separate servers (using several computers for the same layer even)? Maybe there is a good reason, I'm just curious.

Jenda
Support Denmark!
Defend the free world!

Comment on Re^3: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: OT: Rewrite or Refactor? by badaiaqrandista (Pilgrim) on Aug 27, 2006 at 20:32 UTC
Yes I need them to run on different servers. I'll probably make up my own communication protocol instead of the XML-based protocols. It's still up for discussion. As long as I can port this old architecture to the new one with the least risk as possible, I don't care how each layer communicate with each other. -cheepy-	[reply]
Re^5: OT: Rewrite or Refactor? by Anonymous Monk on Aug 30, 2006 at 13:56 UTC
SOAP::Lite comes to mind for internal communication. Because it installs proxy-objects that can be used like the real ones. So is largely no modification required for communication.	[reply]