in reply to Re: No more Perl "compiler"
in thread No more Perl "compiler"

If it works for you perhaps you'd consider maintaining it?
You're joking, right? Just because I used it successfully as advertised doesn't mean that I'm familiar enough with its internal workings to be able to maintain/fix/improve it. (Otherwise, I would have considered breaking it out as a separate CPAN module.)
You never commented to my p5p post of several months ago about removing it.
I must have missed it. However, I'm not gainsaying the decision to remove it: If its a failed feature, then it should be removed. My post was meant to inform others of its removal, and to query about possible alternatives.
Remember: There's always one more bug.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: No more Perl "compiler"
by diotalevi (Canon) on Sep 12, 2006 at 20:54 UTC

    If it works for you perhaps you'd consider maintaining it?
    You're joking, right? Just because I used it successfully as advertised doesn't mean that I'm familiar enough with its internal workings to be able to maintain/fix/improve it. (Otherwise, I would have considered breaking it out as a separate CPAN module.)
    No, I wasn't joking. I think you're really capable and could do it.

    My post was meant to inform others of its removal, and to query about possible alternatives.
    For your purpose you'd switch to some persistent environment like what you already suggested or pperl.

    ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

[reply]

In Section Meditations