in reply to Re: Re: Re: wrapping any given shell
in thread wrapping any given shell

>>The original poster should note that what he's trying to do is hardly novel or original, and most any major company's data center will have >>security policies requiring such accounting, and have generally thought of ways to do it securely. I'd avoid rolling my own, as this is definitely >>an area that you want to build upon the work of others, as there are a million little things you have to account for or else your installation is >>vulnerable to being circumvented.

actually, I'm writing this FOR major company's data centers, precisely because no such tool exists to do this in a foolproof manner.

It may be because attempting it in userspace is just not possible...

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: wrapping any given shell

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wrapping any given shell
by Fastolfe (Vicar) on Feb 09, 2001 at 08:32 UTC
    It may be because attempting it in userspace is just not possible

    Unfortunately, I think you're going to find that this is the case. I can probably ask our SA group to see how they're going about it, but I know it at least involves standard Unix process accounting. Where that file is stored (like on a network filesystem or what) and how it is protected I don't know.