ranting (Re^3: Reliable software OR Is CPAN the sacred cow)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: ranting (Re^3: Reliable software OR Is CPAN the sacred cow) by eric256 (Parson) on Sep 18, 2006 at 13:46 UTC
By bad reputation he didn't mean your rep points, he meant your actual reputation with the monks here. How good of response do you think you'll get next time you have a problem? BTW Number of nodes isn't realy a usefull way to tell if something was answered. You could have phrased this right and gotten a single response answering it. Instead you now have a bunch of monks who just wont bother to try and help you in the future. ___________ Eric Hodges	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re: ranting (Re^3: Reliable software OR Is CPAN the sacred cow) by badaiaqrandista (Pilgrim) on Sep 18, 2006 at 22:56 UTC
It seems that you've confused quality and quantity. They sure got a lot of comments, but can you learn much from them? Your "solution" is a good way to ask. And that's the kind of answer you'd get. You wont get a lot of answer, but you can learn from that. Isn't that better than pissing people off just to get a simple answer like that? -cheepy-	[reply]