Re^2: C++ object & PERL garbage collection

I'm wondering whether the object isn't being constructed and blessed in C++ using XS. If that's the case then I guess I could see how this might be happening. I still really want to see the code to understand what kind of brokenness is occurring here.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

Comment on Re^2: C++ object & PERL garbage collection

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: C++ object & PERL garbage collection by Anonymous Monk on Sep 23, 2006 at 01:22 UTC
`1) we use SWIG, not XS the C++ object is a PERL HASH i can invokes methods on the object with OBJ->method() just like a PERL object! :-)` [download] exactly what code do you want to see? i sort of feel that this is a "philosophical" issue and not a "coding" mistake in another reply, i pointed out that OUR works. based on my limited understanding of OUR; it seems that OUR prevents PERL from deleting the C++ Object when its being passed around. but the OUR declaration has to be global	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: C++ object & PERL garbage collection
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 23, 2006 at 01:22 UTC

1) we use SWIG, not XS
   the C++ object is a PERL HASH
   i can invokes methods on the object with
        OBJ->method()
   just like a PERL object!   :-)
[download]

[reply]
[d/l]