in reply to Re: Parsing using m//g
in thread Parsing using m//g
To be correct, your output would have to be:
[name1 => value1] [name2 => value2] [name3 => value3 but wait, there is more] [name4 => value4]
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Parsing using m//g
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 25, 2006 at 16:09 UTC |