in reply to Re^9: Algorithm advice sought for seaching through GB's of text (email) files
in thread Algorithm advice sought for seaching through GB's of text (email) files

Are you implying that I am lying?

Dog no! I'm pursuing further information about a phenomena that I have not encountered, had not found reference to, and want to understand. I am pursuing it further simply because you are the source.

Let me make that very clear. Because you are the source of the information, I have to take it seriously.

That I could not have seen what I already said I did?

Again no, but with respect, we have all misinterpreted imperical evidence from time to time. That's not an accusation. When I see a phenomena that doesn't gel with the logic and reason of my internal model of things, either:

It's my habit to try and discover which.

The url you posted is an interesting starting point. Thankyou. I will trouble you no further.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^10: Algorithm advice sought for seaching through GB's of text (email) files

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom