Re^2: [RFC] Stringifying a thread

'==' is alreadly overloaded for threads, therefore overload.pm is already loaded. As a result, adding ""-overloading doesn't cost anything extra.

As to performance, my tests show that overloading only costs a few percent. However, generating a 'default' string from an object (e.g. 'threads=SCALAR(0xABCDABCD)') is HUGELY expensive. Therefore, I found that for ops like "... $thr ..." and $hash{$thr} there is a greater than 500% speed improvement overall with ""-overloading.

However, while the performance increase is really nice, I like the usabily aspects more.

Remember: There's always one more bug.

Comment on Re^2: [RFC] Stringifying a thread

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: [RFC] Stringifying a thread by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 06, 2006 at 15:02 UTC
It's not like most of the calls in threads are generally high frequency calls. `create` and `async` have to spawn a new interpreter and clone god know's what.`join` has to wait for a thread to finish and an interpreter to be cleaned up. Not much else is performance criticla either. Even in the 'spawn and discard' model of server application, there are at least two IO operations which would totally swamp any overload overhead. If the overloading had a detrimental affect upon some of the calls in threads::shared, like `lock` or `cond_signal`, that might be noteworthy, but presumably that is not the case? Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: [RFC] Stringifying a thread by ysth (Canon) on Oct 06, 2006 at 17:24 UTC
'==' is alreadly overloaded for threads, therefore overload.pm is already loaded. As a result, adding ""-overloading doesn't cost anything extra. Then you can disregard everything I said, except that you may want to switch to using the XS OVERLOAD: keyword.	[reply]
Re^4: [RFC] Stringifying a thread by jdhedden (Deacon) on Oct 06, 2006 at 18:31 UTC
The XS OVERLOAD: keyword is not applicable here because the consensus is to make the overloading optional. Therefore, it must be done in the 'import' method in threads.pm. Thanks for the suggestion though. Remember: There's always one more bug.	[reply]