Re^5: Reap deleted CatQA nodes instead of nuke? (filter)

CatQ+A isn't much like the other sections. That is why nuking was allowed there. It makes no sense to me to include a bunch of noise in a section meant to help the relatively inexperienced find answers.

- tye

Comment on Re^5: Reap deleted CatQA nodes instead of nuke? (filter)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Reap deleted CatQA nodes instead of nuke? (filter) by jdporter (Paladin) on Oct 30, 2006 at 21:16 UTC
O.k., I've done that part on the dev server now as well. What else? We're building the house of the future together.	[reply]
Re^6: Reap deleted CatQA nodes instead of nuke? (filter) by jdporter (Paladin) on Oct 31, 2006 at 13:25 UTC
Y'know, I have to say, after going through this exercise, I agree with you that the current implementation of the Q&A section is just crazy; there's no reason it should be so different. I think we should make a new section, cloned from perlquestion, and move the current Q&A content over to it. What do you think? Wouldn't this work about as easily an anything else? We're building the house of the future together.	[reply]