in reply to Re: Returning an error message when <STDIN> is not in use
in thread Returning an error message when <STDIN> is not in use

I'm not entirely certain, but I think he's referring to the magic behavior of the <> operator when you don't give it a filehandle. This is not STDIN as such, but it's similarly magic (insofar as it allows reading from a filehandle without opening it first), and it makes a certain amount of sense in conjunction with what he was saying about arguments.


Sanity? Oh, yeah, I've got all kinds of sanity. In fact, I've developed whole new kinds of sanity. You can just call me "Mister Sanity". Why, I've got so much sanity it's driving me crazy.