in reply to Re: Advisability of circular dependencies in packages
in thread Advisability of circular dependencies in packages

That sounds like a recipe for the Big Ball of Mud to me. Did you mean to say "merge the mutual parts into a single, separate, third module"?

  • Comment on Re^2: Advisability of circular dependencies in packages

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Advisability of circular dependencies in packages
by rhesa (Vicar) on Nov 13, 2006 at 21:28 UTC
    I happened to be reading Big Ball of Mud, and I think it's good enough to mention the link. Ironically, the whole book is on one big page ;^)
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom