Re: WWW::Mechanize issue

forgive me if i'm wrong but i would of thought...

my $mech = WWW::Mechanize->new();
$mech->cookie_jar( {} );
[download]

is the same as...

my $mech = WWW::Mechanize->new( cookie_jar => undef );
[download]

Comment on Re: WWW::Mechanize issue Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: WWW::Mechanize issue by AK108 (Friar) on Nov 18, 2006 at 22:42 UTC
No. undef accepts no cookies, while a hashref accepts cookies in an in-memory cookie jar. This is explained in WWW::Mechanize's documentation (the section where new() is explained).	[reply]
Re^2: WWW::Mechanize issue by Anonymous Monk on Nov 17, 2006 at 17:31 UTC
It is the same	[reply]