in reply to YAML for logs?
I've seen people make the same arguments about using Lisp as a serialization format for log files. In your case, you lose if you use YAML because of the multiple version thing going on. Hopefully there's a stream reading YAML library. If so, just feed it a handle and go to town.
Personally I hate YAML because I find it impossible to edit by hand even though people keep assuring me that it's designed for that. They're liars, all. I've found I nearly always need a computer to write the YAML for me. It's a stupid, stupid language and somehow, for some strange reason, it's the fad right now. It makes me want to puke on my shoes.
⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: YAML for logs?
by blazar (Canon) on Nov 25, 2006 at 17:31 UTC | |
by diotalevi (Canon) on Nov 25, 2006 at 18:29 UTC | |
by clinton (Priest) on Nov 25, 2006 at 19:55 UTC | |
|
Re^2: YAML for logs?
by clinton (Priest) on Nov 25, 2006 at 17:05 UTC | |
|
Re^2: YAML for logs?
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Nov 25, 2006 at 20:44 UTC | |
by dgaramond2 (Monk) on Nov 29, 2006 at 01:28 UTC | |
|
Re^2: YAML for logs?
by j3 (Friar) on Nov 25, 2006 at 22:52 UTC |