in reply to JAPH - more obscure than obfuscated...

See also My late-nite japh attempt :-) for a similar idea.

  • Comment on Re: JAPH - more obscure than obfuscated...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: JAPH - more obscure than obfuscated...
by Melly (Chaplain) on Nov 30, 2006 at 11:55 UTC

    Thanks for the ++'s - although it brings me closer to the dreaded day when I stop being a Pilgrim (cool!) and become a Friar (not cool)

    So rand is random... how... appropriate ;)

    Here's the cross-platform version then...(wot, you mean there are other platforms apart from Win and Linux?)

    @i='058233660927207121220869229603962185544803008278'=~/.{8}/g; @i='458441005222895647973137125730975323984043625316'=~/.{8}/g if$^Oeq +'MSWin32'; map{srand$i[$_];map{print chr(32+int(rand 59))}1..4}0..5;
    Tom Melly, pm@tomandlu.co.uk