in reply to Re^2: Questions concerning /o regex modifier
in thread Questions concerning /o regex modifier

It's not a signal to 99% of the humans that will read it because almost no one gets what /o does. There's just the "Oh! Optimized! Ok, it's more better n' good!"

It is faster to avoid doing the concatenation and string comparison work than not but those are cheap operations. If you were optimizing for that then you could just as well pass in a qr// object.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

  • Comment on Re^3: Questions concerning /o regex modifier

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Questions concerning /o regex modifier
by sgt (Deacon) on Dec 01, 2006 at 22:48 UTC

    really? I always thought /o had a good mnemonic from the start "compile once" ... and not many ... so you think once? why...

    the bad ones are /s and /m, I taught myself to read them as:

  • /s superdot
  • /m multi-anchor
  • a rather long process actually if I remember correctly ...

    --steph