in reply to Re: Dynamically wrapping ancestor method calls
in thread Dynamically wrapping ancestor method calls

rafl,
I intentionally didn't mention you specifically because you didn't post here when I suggested you to. Avoiding subclassing all together was one way I thought of too. I still want to know if anyone has a clean way of doing it as originally asked. Sometimes innovative thinking comes from unexpected places.

Minor wording updates

Cheers - L~R

  • Comment on Re^2: Dynamically wrapping ancestor method calls