in reply to Dynamically wrapping ancestor method calls
You'd lose out if anyone did anything as gross as installing methods in the superclass at methods at runtime, but who would abuse perl like that ;-) <-- Note ironic smiley.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Dynamically wrapping ancestor method calls
by Limbic~Region (Chancellor) on Dec 11, 2006 at 17:47 UTC | |
by jbert (Priest) on Dec 11, 2006 at 20:09 UTC | |
by rafl (Friar) on Dec 11, 2006 at 21:21 UTC | |
by jbert (Priest) on Dec 11, 2006 at 21:37 UTC | |
by rafl (Friar) on Dec 12, 2006 at 23:37 UTC | |
by Limbic~Region (Chancellor) on Dec 11, 2006 at 20:39 UTC |