Re: Methods For Better Questions

The problem I see with your solution is whether you are going to require Anonymous Monks to read one or more nodes every time they want to post even if they have not been in error. And if you set up a mechanism to recognize when an Anonymous Monk has posted before, where's the anonymity?

Not that it is a bad idea, per se, but you might have to give up true anonymity for those who wish it to secure better procedures and titles from some.

xenchu the dim (ie. dimwit)

Well, 'splain it to me!

Comment on Re: Methods For Better Questions

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Methods For Better Questions by madbombX (Hermit) on Dec 12, 2006 at 03:11 UTC
While this is true, I am not trying to take away their anonimity. I would just prefer that they be required to read it every time they post. If they would like to continue to post, then register. If they are already registered, then post as themselves. If we are truly a non-bashing community, then no one should be ashamed to ask for help.	[reply]
Re^3: Methods For Better Questions by dimwit (Acolyte) on Dec 15, 2006 at 00:43 UTC
Anonymity seems to be a tradition on PerlMonks. Perhaps the question of whether PerlMonks wants to change that tradition should be discussed before discussing a change to posting procedure. Requiring anonmyous monks to read the node every time they posted just means they have to go to the node. How are you going to ensure that the node was read? It would be easy enough to scroll to the bottom of the node (or wherever) and hit the 'I read it' button without paying any attention to the information in the node at all. It is rather hard to force people to do things anonymously. They will cooperate or not but only if they want to. Forcing the issue brings us back to the question of whether to have anonymity at all. xenchu the dim (ie. dimwit) Well, 'splain it to me!	[reply]