Re^2: get query string to HTML::Template

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: get query string to HTML::Template by shmem (Chancellor) on Dec 19, 2006 at 18:54 UTC
The tone you perceived is not the tone I have emitted. I asked two simple questions, and having those answered, I will be able to answer as per the monastery guidelines, i.e. provide hopefully helpful advice. Furthermore, I did give advice on where to look for improving s.o. asking skills. What exactly do you deem unfriendly? regards, --shmem _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ / /\_¯/(q / ---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."· ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: get query string to HTML::Template by Anonymous Monk on Dec 20, 2006 at 06:40 UTC
Commenting on tone is considered bad form. Lecturing a pedagogue on tone won't win you any admirers.	[reply]
Re^4: get query string to HTML::Template by ptum (Priest) on Dec 20, 2006 at 16:09 UTC
I disagree. I think that commenting on tone is likely to earn negative XP, but I believe that it is still an important way that the monastery self-corrects. Personally, I appreciate it (once I have had time to regain a cool head) when people (especially people I respect or trust) communicate to me that my tone was offensive in some way. I don't think that membership in pedagogues or even gods places a person somehow above the need to be corrected when they are rude. Looking at shmem's post, and taking it in context with other posts by shmem, I think that jzb was wrong in interpreting it as having an unfriendly tone, but that is just my opinion.	[reply]
Re^5: get query string to HTML::Template by Anonymous Monk on Dec 21, 2006 at 03:29 UTC
Which is more necessary, discussing tone or staying on topic? For tone, use /msg	[reply]