in reply to Which CPAN modules are most used/depended upon?

I really wish there were some opt-in statistical reporting for CPAN. Personally, I'd like to see if people are using the stuff I wrote, but it'd also be neat to see which modules are really popular so I could check them out. Unfortunately, I don't think anything like that exists.

-Paul

  • Comment on Re: Which CPAN modules are most used/depended upon?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Which CPAN modules are most used/depended upon?
by merlyn (Sage) on Dec 26, 2006 at 19:04 UTC
    Personally, I'd like to see if people are using the stuff I wrote,
    That's easy. Look at the size of your rt.cpan.org queue. If it's empty, either your code is perfect (unlikely), or nobody is using it or cares about it.

      That's definitely an indicator of something, but not really what I had in mind. I don't think rt.cpan.org is really that popular yet. In addition, if I am personally an example of a human, then I figure most people that experience a problem with a module simply code around it or email the author. The only person that's ever re-directed me to rt after an email is Mr. Tang, the the author of PAR.

      The author of Convert::ASN1 (for example) just fixed the problem and released a new version. I noticed that the only tickets open on that are spam with a couple real ones from 10 months ago. I have a hunch Mr. Barr doesn't even know rt is there, nor do most of the module's users.

      Don't get me wrong, I can't wait for rt to take off. It's really slick. But I don't think it's a very good indicator of whether people are using your modules yet.

      -Paul

        The latest h2xs templates push RT as the "reporting system of choice". Of course, older-built modules don't get this retrofitted, but it's clearly becoming more promoted over time.
        update: Apparently, not h2xs. Perhaps Module::Starter? I know there's some tool I've played with that adds a standard rt.cpan.org mailing link.