Re^3: Garbage collection problem?? (Win32 CRTL malloc)

If you look at my tests, they are not using Windows at all nor is it using ActivePerl. Some people have said that it is not an issue on their system but have not posted what type of system they are running (except for OS X).

Update: You are correct, I misread your post, sorry about that...

Comment on Re^3: Garbage collection problem?? (Win32 CRTL malloc)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Garbage collection problem?? ("second") by tye (Sage) on Dec 27, 2006 at 19:31 UTC
No, you misunderstand the problem statement. Your results don't show the problem: `sgkirkup@72sp691lin:~$ ./performance-test.pl Section A took 0.8600 CPU seconds Section B took 2.1800 CPU seconds Section A took 0.8800 CPU seconds Section B took 2.2200 CPU seconds` [download] The problem isn't that "Section B" takes longer than "Section A", but that the second run of "Section B" takes longer than the first run of "Section B" (and not just slightly longer). - tye	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Garbage collection problem?? ("second")
by tye (Sage) on Dec 27, 2006 at 19:31 UTC

No, you misunderstand the problem statement. Your results don't show the problem:

sgkirkup@72sp691lin:~$ ./performance-test.pl 
Section A took 0.8600 CPU seconds
Section B took 2.1800 CPU seconds
Section A took 0.8800 CPU seconds
Section B took 2.2200 CPU seconds
[download]

The problem isn't that "Section B" takes longer than "Section A", but that the second run of "Section B" takes longer than the first run of "Section B" (and not just slightly longer).

- tye

[reply]
[d/l]