Re: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

We don't need a special group for this; every monk of level Friar and above is already empowered to do this.

:-)

Comment on Re: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Grammarians: do we need a new group? by Corion (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2007 at 08:34 UTC
If you mean the power of considering nodes, then no. I don't feel that grammar should be corrected by janitors and nodes considered for grammar changes should be unconsidered immediately. If you really feel offended by grammar, consider `/msg`ing the author of the node. Let's not make Consideration more abused than it is already. It may be that I misunderstood your node and you meant it as a joke, in the same sense that I understand the root node as a request in jest, if so, then I admit that the joke went far over my head ;)	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Grammarians: do we need a new group?
by Corion (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2007 at 08:34 UTC

If you mean the power of considering nodes, then no. I don't feel that grammar should be corrected by janitors and nodes considered for grammar changes should be unconsidered immediately. If you really feel offended by grammar, consider /msging the author of the node.

Let's not make Consideration more abused than it is already.

It may be that I misunderstood your node and you meant it as a joke, in the same sense that I understand the root node as a request in jest, if so, then I admit that the joke went far over my head ;)

[reply]
[d/l]