in reply to Math fun.

Somewhere I missed what you are actualy trying to do. What is the problem? You mention CalcIt and have a bunch of sum and maps, but is there a definition of the formula you are trying to solve?


___________
Eric Hodges

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Math fun.
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Feb 14, 2007 at 00:12 UTC
    is there a definition of the formula you are trying to solve?

    No there isn't. That was part 2 of the problem. The bunch of sums and maps produces the results I require as verified by comparison against the results of exhuastive generation of the computation is summarises. I was looking to reduce the computationally intensive work involved in arriving at those results for higher values of $N & $depth.

    Or rather, there wasn't. However, ikegami has divined a generalized formula, which is what I was seeking.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom