in reply to Re: Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)
in thread Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)

Whoops. Right. Of course. Thanks kyle.

(Edit): But why was it placed inside the eval string instead of the line above the eval?

  • Comment on Re^2: Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Feb 15, 2007 at 22:22 UTC

    So as not to disturb the subsequent eval.

    As to why to inline the module, my guess is so as to keep the entire file runnable as a single file. To install it, just put it in the appropriate directory for your web server. That's it.