in reply to Re: Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)
in thread Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)
I created my own small example, and both use and require seem to work equally well.
I realize that use Foo; is equivalent to BEGIN { require Foo; Foo->import; }, and so using use ``adds one more level''... but it doesn't seem to make a difference in this case, does it?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Odd convention? (fall-back module in BEGIN block)
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 15, 2007 at 23:08 UTC |