in reply to RFC: Standard configuration interface...

I thought that was the point of Config::Auto? Isn't this basically doing the same thing?
  • Comment on Re: RFC: Standard configuration interface...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Standard configuration interface...
by EvanK (Chaplain) on Feb 20, 2007 at 21:15 UTC
    Good point, it does...to an extent. It doesn't have an OO interface, but that's more a matter of preference, I suppose. Mabye I'll just subclass Config::Auto and build on top of it.

    __________
    Systems development is like banging your head against a wall...
    It's usually very painful, but if you're persistent, you'll get through it.