Of course, if he parses the file by splitting on white space and then on "=" like most people would first think to do, then you've ensured that anyone who can edit the color file can cause him to run arbitrary code.
Maybe not a big deal for him but probably not a great meme to spread around.
Worse, your example evals the final string, not the color text once when parsing. That means if he has "$1 dollar" anywhere in his text he's getting lord knows what in place of "$1"... probably "=" or the last title word ("color15"?) depending on how his parser works. Hopefully he won't print a nice "$$$$$$$$$$$$" anywhere when decorating his report. :)
--
$you = new YOU;
honk() if $you->love(perl)
| [reply] [d/l] |
Yeah sure, I agree that eval is always potentially
dangerous... I figured this is rather well-known. And, I wasn't trying
to spread "great memes" :) Rather, I was simply trying to
generically answer the problem of "Normally, I would use a double
quoted string in my script... now what do I do to arrive at the same
effect when I hold the part in between the quotes literally in a
string, like when having read it from a file?" Nowhere in the OP
was any mention of other people potentially having control over the input.
Along similar lines you'd have to warn people every time they
interpolate some variable into some command like
system "convert $imgname.png $imgname.jpg"
because, if $imgname could potentially come from an insecure
source, they might get into trouble inadvertendly running something like
system "convert ; rm -rf ~/* ;.png ..."
I'd probably even mention it if the danger is obvious, like someone
inexperienced trying to execute code like this in CGI context or some
such, but otherwise... should we always warn?
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
[about string eval to enforce interpolation]
I'd probably even mention it if the danger is obvious, like someone inexperienced trying to execute code like this in CGI context or some such, but otherwise... should we always warn?
Well, you don't know in what context someone will read your write-up in the future. Even in the given context, I am by no means sure if the original author is aware of the possible risk. She or he accepted the advice rather light-heartedly. I think we should always warn.
Anno
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |