in reply to Re^2: I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES() (hash method?!)
in thread I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES()
So it appears we have yet another inconvenient and/or incomplete way to check whether something can be used as a hash.
The hash example was an analogy--an analogy of a different type of allomorphism already present in Perl 5.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES() (hash method?!)
by tye (Sage) on Mar 09, 2007 at 04:09 UTC |