in reply to Re: disable perl for some users
in thread disable perl for some users

Given that the OP talked about Apache, then that's a Really Bad Idea, as it would let remote users construct requests like http://example.com/~user/perl%20-e%20'system("rm%20-rf")'.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: disable perl for some users
by f00li5h (Chaplain) on Mar 26, 2007 at 09:43 UTC

    Another option would be to include a perl binary in thier home directroy ...

    Home directory ne document root

    It would be a terrible idea to expose a user's home directory as their document root, this is why apache defaults to sharing ~user/public_html/ as ~user/ to the world

    The user would still have to stick perl in a ScriptAlias'ed or Options +ExecCGI'ed directory for your url to have a chance of working, Apache would try to find a file called q[perl -e 'system("rm -rf")'], which won't generally be there. In an html directory, they'd be likely to get a download of the perl binary instead.

    @_=qw; ask f00li5h to appear and remain for a moment of pretend better than a lifetime;;s;;@_[map hex,split'',B204316D8C2A4516DE];;y/05/os/&print;

    Update

    • added the bit about a file called q[ perl -e 'system("rm -rf")']