in reply to XML::LibXML seems to be under-documented
You've even started with a complaint! How fitting!
The biggest problem I've found with the docs for XML::LibXML is that I have to keep in mind the @ISA hierarchy, and remember that a Document @ISA Node, for example. But I've never actually found the docs lacking any essential information that I couldn't quickly test to confirm.
If you're happy with Twig, stay with it. Don't use XML::LibXML. You might not even know what to do with all that speed increase or additional features. But a post like this one you just made just shows more about your ignorance and drama-queen nature than anything else. It's not a constructive complaint. More of a whine.
For example, here's a post that might have covered the same ground, and got you somewhere:
Hi, I like some of the features I'm seeing in XML::LibXML, but I find the documentation lacking. Are there places where I can ask more questions, or see more examples, to help me understand better? Oh, and is the author available for comments about the docs? Thank you.And you would have been offered help here, and been pointed to the perl-xml mailing list, where the author frequently answers questions and does indeed update the docs when given specific pointers. You might also have been pointed to a few of my columns where I use XML::LibXML.
But that's not what you did. Welcome back, princepawn. :)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: XML::LibXML seems to be under-documented
by hardburn (Abbot) on Mar 29, 2007 at 20:54 UTC |