in reply to Re^6: How to implement a fourth protocol
in thread How to implement a fourth protocol

You claim you are doing all of this to save time and money on your project but you do not even realize just how deep these waters you are treading into are! And because of that you are likely to have the opposite effect. But you do not want to hear that. In fact, you know you are right so you will actually respond to posts that conflict with your world view in a condescending and hostile manner as indicated by Re^6: How to implement a fourth protocol, Re^8: How to implement a fourth protocol, Re^2: How to implement a fourth protocol, Re^4: How to implement a fourth protocol, and Re^6: How to implement a fourth protocol. Or at least that's the impression your posts leave me with.

You keep talking about managing risk but the one thing you are not doing is managing how much risk you yourself are posing to your projects. In this case you do not know enough about networking and security to make a sound judgment. You need to defer to others with more expertise.

  • Comment on Re^7: How to implement a fourth protocol

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: How to implement a fourth protocol
by Moron (Curate) on Apr 02, 2007 at 10:05 UTC
    Sound judgement comes from thorough analysis, not by deferring without understanding what you are doing. I challenge other posts if they seem to draw conclusions too rashly or to get more info.

    -M

    Free your mind

      But you cannot know everything! At some point, especially as a manager, you are going to have to defer to someone with more expertise. The sound judgment then is knowing who to defer to and making sure you have access to the right people (via friends, contacts, the people you hire, etc.).

      Asking on Perl Monks would have been a much, much better idea if you had been more willing to listen to the answers you got even if you did not like them.

      I am really concerned for you and your team because you seem to be micro-managing the technology even though you are not qualified to do so. If I was working under you I think I would find that extremely frustrating and I would consider the project more likely to run into problems (over budget, past due, etc.). I understand your desire to be on top of things but you need to let go of that desire to control everything and focus on better delegation, trust in your team, etc.

      Update: Added italics for emphasis

        Actually, no, I will limit myself to only doing what is in my expertise and no-one elses and delegate everything that I can - You have mispredicted that because I challenge information and ideas to assure their quality and to seek alternatives before commiting human resources.

        -M

        Free your mind

          A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.