in reply to prototypes: so many \@'s?

I asked a similar question at the end of Re^5: Gratuitous use of Perl Prototypes but never received an answer.

Also, I originally used the same approach in Re: More functional programming utilities, but eventually decided for that purpose that multimap \( @a, @b, @c, @d, ... ); was preferable as it meant I could pass anonymous arrays and other similar constructs. Eg. multimap [...],[...];, whereas the prototype version insists upon real arrays.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: prototypes: so many \@'s?
by dk (Chaplain) on Apr 03, 2007 at 21:56 UTC
    Still no answer, but thanks++ for the interesting links!