in reply to Re^2: Method Chaining and Accessors
in thread Method Chaining and Accessors

I remember reading mention of the performance hit. Dragonchild: Was your C::R experience before or after last month's release?

cat >~/.sig </dev/interesting

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Method Chaining and Accessors
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Apr 06, 2007 at 00:51 UTC
    I haven't touched it in at least a year, if not longer. My issues with it aren't performance-related, they're concept-related. I think that it's a neat idea and a great demonstration of Perl's power. But, it's something that should be avoided at all costs in productionable code, unless there's simply no other way to do what you want to do. And, I mean NO OTHER WAY. Like, you've seriously tried 3 or 4 other solutions first.
    My criteria for good software:
    1. Does it work?
    2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom