in reply to Passing a sth to CGI form element methods
What's probably a better solution than adding support for database statement handles would be the more generic approach of adding support for iterators. Then, you'd only have to check if the value for values is a code ref instead of checking its class.
The problem I see is that the popup is generated entirely in memory (and returned to be printed), so you're only going to save a fraction of the memory you could save.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Passing a sth to CGI form element methods
by agianni (Hermit) on Apr 11, 2007 at 14:31 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 11, 2007 at 15:04 UTC |